![]() ![]() The said that the court decision means that "young women today will come of age with fewer rights than their mothers and grandmothers." Indeed, they said the court's opinion means that "from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of. Calling the decision "a serious jolt to the legal system," he said that both the majority and dissent displayed "a relentless freedom from doubt on the legal issue that I cannot share."ĭissenting were Justices Stephen Breyer, appointed by President Clinton, and Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, appointed by President Obama. Bush, concurred in the judgment only, and would have limited the decision to upholding the Mississippi law at issue in the case, which banned abortions after 15 weeks. Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by President George W. Joining the Alito opinion were Justice Clarence Thomas, appointed by the first President Bush, and the three Trump appointees - Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Wade and the future of reproductive rights in America What might life look like in a post-Roe America? The decision may well mean too that the court itself, as well as the abortion question, will become a focal point in the upcoming fall elections and in the fall and thereafter. For all practical purposes, abortion will not be available in large swaths of the country. The decision, most of which was leaked in early May, means that abortion rights will be rolled back in nearly half of the states immediately, with more restrictions likely to follow. Writing for the court majority, Justice Samuel Alito said that the 1973 Roe ruling and repeated subsequent high court decisions reaffirming Roe "must be overruled" because they were "egregiously wrong," the arguments "exceptionally weak" and so "damaging" that they amounted to "an abuse of judicial authority." Wade on Friday, declaring that the constitutional right to abortion, upheld for nearly a half century, no longer exists. In a historic and far-reaching decision, the U.S. The Trump Administration rule rolled back these limits and would have had virtually no impact on these emissions, prolonging the nation’s reliance on polluting, expensive coal power plants and obstructing states’ progress towards clean, renewable, and affordable electricity generation.Anti-abortion activists rally in front of the U.S. The Clean Power Plan was the first-ever nationwide limit on one of the largest sources of climate change pollution - existing fossil-fueled power plants. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the Administration's Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, or so-called “Dirty Power” rule, which replaced the Clean Power Plan. In January 2021, Attorney General James won a lawsuit against the Trump Administration when the U.S. Supreme Court in this case, providing a strong legal defense of the ability of EPA and states to set meaningful limits on climate change pollution from power plants under the Clean Air Act. In January 2022, Attorney General James led a coalition of 30 states and local governments in submitting a brief to the U.S. It’s not too late to move off the path towards climate disaster, but we must take decisive action now.”Īttorney General James has long been a leader in the national effort to protect the planet from the impacts of pollution and climate change. ![]() We will work to end our nation’s reliance on fossil-fuel power plants that pollute our environment, and move towards clean, renewable, and affordable electricity. Despite this setback, my office will continue to be a champion for our environment, our future, and the health of New Yorkers. Climate change is an imminent and indisputable threat, and EPA must be able to regulate the energy industry so that the worst consequences can be avoided. “Today’s ruling is a dangerous and irresponsible restriction on federal agencies’ ability to carry out their functions. EPA to restrict the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to limit carbon emissions from power plants: ![]() Supreme Court’s decision today in West Virginia v. NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James issued the following statement in response to the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |